SMRC situated in Bhubaneswar Orissa has been
campaigning fro the Rights of Disabled in Disaster
Preparedness and Management and since 1999.
In 1999 a cyclone of an intense magnitude hit the
coast of Orissa in India. The response to the
‘super cyclone’ did not include the disabled,
though SMRC as member of the UN and State
Coordination Committee tried that disabled be
included in policy and implementation. As there
was complete chaos disability was an issue far
from policy makers, implementers and donor’s
views.
|
|
|
Despite SMRC’s campaign the response was simply not
there. SMRC with financial assistance of Cord Aid
and later Action Aid started to provide relief and
rehabilitation to the disabled affected by the
cyclone. It resettled about 3000 persons with
disabilities in the process in the area of
Jagatsingpur which was affected the most.
The methodology was comprehensive rehabilitation of
disabled from medical treatment, barrier free
housing to social inclusion. At this stage
preparedness could not be taken up. In 2004 after
recurring floods had hit the State and in India
disasters were coming to the forefront, SMRC then
initiated a full-fledged campaign on disaster
preparedness and response . This time round it
The Campaign is based on
1. Research both field based and conceptual.
2. Setting up Standards at all levels from
international to local
3. Networking with agencies and institutions
interested in eth subject
Since 2004 its work has included
Research
1. Developed a Training Manual to address needs of
disabled. Majority training modules reviewed did not
have a disability component. Very few modules have
included disability but again in a very peripheral
way.
2. Study in Orissa's worst affected district
Jagatsinghpur, Orissa to know the status of PWDs.
i. Field Data from after super cyclone in Orissa,
Tsunami in South Asia and the Kashmir Earthquake
showed that Research & Development on the impact of
social, health and psychological trauma must be
encouraged to reduce the incidence of disasters.
ii. Even the very basic needs of PWDs have been
neglected during (Pre-Disaster, During Disaster and
After Disaster).
iii. Stakeholders were not aware about even broad
management of disability.
iv. No funding was available for disability
v. Cyclone shelters, school buildings and other
structures used for disasters were not accessible to
the disabled
Standards
Setting National and Local Standards
1. Studied the existing disaster relief codes, the
national disaster act, training modules developed by
various agencies including Sphere and found that:
a. Relief codes do not address special needs
meaningfully such as emergency warning in accessible
format for disabled, independent accessibility to
shelters, communications that can be understood by
disabled (Blind, Hearing Impaired) etc. In relief
codes of some states disabled are covered under
vulnerable groups in a casual manner. Disaster
Management Act' 2005, do not accommodate needs of
PWDs.
Setting International Standards
i. With the Tsunami hitting Asia, the matter became
international, and opportunities were seen that
perhaps International Standards could be set with
the Inclusion of PWDs in Disaster Preparedness,
Management and Response. SMRC approached the Global
Health Research Forum (part of WHO) to start
discussions at the international level. As such a
meeting at Mumbai Forum 9 was used to take the
agenda forward.
ii. Inclusion in UN Disability Convention. As a
member of the UN Ad Hoc Committee on Disability SMRC
participated in the negotiations of the Convention.
It participated specifically in introduction of Art
11
iii. Inclusion in other agenda’s As Associate member
of Rehabilitation International it has pushed the
agenda for the inclusion of disaster response.
3. SMRC reviewed composition of various committees,
task force, peer groups at various level formed for
disaster management and preparedness, and found
that:
a. People with Disabilities or experts in
disabilities management were not included.
b. The Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment
dealing with PWDs was not represented.
|